According to the 2024 ABA Legal Technology Survey, 75% of attorneys now report using cloud computing, up from 60% just three years ago. With tools like Microsoft Teams, OneDrive, and Google Drive layered on top of legacy systems, the digital workplace has never been more complex or fragmented.
And yet, despite this rapid shift to modern platforms, many law firms are still grappling with one of the most persistent questions in information governance: Where should our content live and how do we manage it once it’s there?
Shared Drives Still Haunt the Industry
The legal industry has long struggled to evolve its approach to content storage. Shared drives, once a necessary convenience, have become a stubborn relic. They remain deeply embedded in firm culture despite limitations including poor version control, weak security, and limited searchability.
In addition, as firms adopt new collaboration platforms without clearly defined governance, the sprawl is only getting worse. Content lives everywhere, classification is inconsistent or non-existent, making the ability to apply necessary access controls very difficult. Information governance teams are left asking the same fundamental questions:
- What data is stored in each repository?
- Who owns what?
- How can we find, protect, and dispose of documents defensibly?
The root cause isn’t technology; it’s behavior.
Rethinking Rules of Engagement
In law firms, lasting progress in information governance depends less on restricting user behavior and more on reframing it. Firms can achieve greater success by creating guardrails that reflect how legal professionals actually work rather than enforcing rigid controls.
To drive that shift, organizations should focus on:
- Designing embedded governance models: Build frameworks that integrate compliance into daily workflows without disrupting them.
- Defining a content placement strategy: Establish clear rules for what types of documents go where, under what conditions, and for how long.
- Implementing structured workspace creation: Ensure that all content for a matter is consistently tagged with relevant metadata so that it can be appropriately secured and tied to approved retention policies, so all systems are part of the same lifecycle strategy.
This isn’t about saying “no” to new tools. It’s about saying “yes, if.”
“Yes, that repository can be used if the folder structure includes client-matter metadata. If it’s indexed for search and disposition. If audit trails and access controls are in place.”
By taking this approach, firms can close governance gaps without compromising productivity.
A Mindset Shift, Not Just a Migration
Resetting shared drive practices isn’t simply a technical migration, it’s an organizational mindset shift. In many firms, practice groups and individuals are accustomed to autonomy, making universal adoption of any new process difficult without the right balance of structure and flexibility.
The goal isn’t perfection, it’s clarity. Clarity around where data belongs, who is responsible for managing it, and how it should be governed across systems is key.
For firms working to bring order to shared drives, unify collaboration environments, or prepare for cloud transformation, this is the moment to reassess both infrastructure and expectations. Harbor works with firms at every stage of that journey by aligning risk management, information technology and operational objectives to build durable, scalable governance strategies.
Terry will be presenting on this topic at ILTACON. Catch his session, “Give Me My Shared Drive Back – Let’s Make a Deal!,” on Monday, Aug. 12 at 4pm.
- Information governance
- Information management
- Information security
- Show all 4