Legal technology does not often experience seismic events. The industry is built on measured incrementalism, tested precedents, and a healthy skepticism of rapid transformation. However, when Anthropic released its legal plugin for Claude Cowork via GitHub on Feb. 3, the tremors reverberated far and wide. Other aftershocks should be expected too.
The impact was not just related to the technology Anthropic released — although the capabilities appear to be significant on initial review. It was foreseeable that one or more of the major players in large language models (LLMs) and the AI chatbots they power (e.g., Anthropic’s Claude, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and Alphabet’s Gemini) would attempt to disrupt the legal technology market. Nevertheless, Anthropic’s plugin signaled a potentially fundamental shift in the architecture of legal operations and how work gets done.
Our Global Head of Harbor Labs, Rudy DeFelice, recently joined BNN Bloomberg to discuss this inflection point. He noted that while few large organizations would swap their enterprise tools for a plugin in most applications today, the challenge LLMs pose to legal tech will continue to grow more significant.
What we do in legal is digest large amounts of information, reason, and create output. And LLMs are very good at this. … A change is coming in the legal space, and traditional companies are going to have to evolve.
Rudy DeFelice, Global Head of Harbor Labs at Harbor
This development heralds a new phase for legal operations, one where law firms and in-house departments shift from experimentation with AI-enabled tools to strategizing for a new era of workflow orchestration and transformation.
The Erosion of the Feature “Moat”
For the last decade or so, legal tech was largely dominated by point solutions. You purchased one tool to assist with e-discovery, another for redlining contracts, another for managed document review, and so on. Generally, these technology vendors sought to build “moats” around specific features.
Anthropic’s release of a legal plugin for Claude Cowork effectively drained those feature moats, but the banks had already begun to erode. Many organizations had sought to reduce tool sprawl and complexity to help get their data out of silos and leverage cross-functional advantages.
Now that a foundational model provider offers a specialized legal layer directly to the consumer, the value of standalone feature declines. Large enterprise organizations will still likely find tremendous value in the purpose-built AI models for legal activities, like those offered by Harvey, Legora and others. But legal intelligence is becoming increasingly commodified.
In particular, smaller organizations may choose to use a legal plugin like Anthropic’s because that co-work environment supports a range of key business functions under a single subscription. If a plugin can handle the bulk of high-level document review or regulatory mapping, there will not be the same demand for software vendors with a single use case.
Overall, users of these technologies inside law firms and legal departments will see this as welcome news. The tricky task of software integration can give way to strategic orchestration. For vendors, they need to demonstrate how their solutions can provide cross-functional legal intelligence in a differentiated way from the enterprise AI foundation models that many organizations have already adopted.
The Strategic Shift in Legal Operations
At Harbor, we’ve already seen a common trend among our most forward-thinking clients. They don’t ask about how to add their AI chatbot on top of old workflows. They want to know how they can recreate workflows by using advanced tools, and how they can support their workforce to adopt those tools.
This is where the real work begins, and that’s also why Harbor launched Harbor Labs its innovation lab for legal operations in 2024. Legal and business leaders have a unique opportunity to shift from a strategy centered around tools to one centered around capabilities.
To navigate this shift, we suggest three strategic proactive steps:
1. Audit for “Feature Redundancy”
Most large organizations and legal departments currently pay for tools with some overlapping AI capabilities, often nested within different legacy software subscriptions. Now is the time to audit that tech stack. Fortunately, our 2025 Harbor Law Department Survey shows that 85% of legal departments now have a dedicated AI resource or governance committee to help guide such an audit. If a platform-level tool can perform the core function of a specialized point solution, then it is time to consolidate. The savings from those licenses can be applied to ongoing innovation and transformation initiatives.
2. Focus on the Data, Not the Interface
A plugin is just a lens, but your data is the scenic view. The most sophisticated LLM in the world still needs to capture a clear picture of the specific work product, historical precedents, and proprietary knowledge. Harbor Labs is currently working with clients to move beyond "generic AI" toward "contextual AI." This means building the data infrastructure that enables technology tools and plugins to understand your organization’s specific legal needs.
3. Redefining the Legal Professional
If the tool or plugin manages the first few stages of the legal operation in question, then the real value of human judgment can focus on the validation and complexity of last-mile delivery. This requires a tremendous shift in training and culture. We are quickly moving toward a world of legal engineers. These are professionals who understand the law as well as the orchestration of technology and processes. They can bring to bear their judgment in knowing when to rely on the AI model’s output and when to override it, and they can defend that decision-making.
The Harbor Perspective: Building for What’s Next
At Harbor, our role has always been to help bridge the gap between where our clients are and where they want to be. The foundation models are no longer just tools, they are poised to become the new operating models for many organizations. Legal tech providers that offer single-point solutions or fragmented technology may face significant disruption, but this represents a major opportunity for end users in law firms and legal departments.
As we help our clients navigate this transition, our focus remains on the long game. We don’t just focus on the latest news and the newest plugin. We evaluate how to design a resilient, tech-enabled business model that can evolve with new advances for legal intelligence.
After the market volatility subsides, organizations will still need to move at the speed of change. The firms that win won't be those with the best legal plugins, but those with the best strategy for using them.
You can watch Rudy DeFelice’s full interview with BNN Bloomberg on YouTube here.
- AI
- Legal operations
- Strategy
- Show all 4